This subsection returns to the simple two-rung spin ladder (doublet)
of an electron, or any other spin
particle for that
matter, and tries to tease out some more information about the spin.
While the analysis so far has made statements about the angular
momentum in the arbitrarily chosen
-direction, you often also need
information about the spin in the corresponding
and
directions. This subsection will find it.
But before getting at it, a matter of notations. It is customary to
indicate angular momentum that is due to spin by a capital
.
Similarly, the azimuthal quantum number of spin is indicated by
.
This subsection will follow this convention.
Now, suppose you know that the particle is in the
“spin-up” state with
angular
momentum in a chosen
direction; in other words that it is in the
, or
, state. You want the effect of the
and
operators on this state. In the absence of a physical model
for the motion that gives rise to the spin, this may seem like a hard
question indeed. But again the faithful ladder operators
and
clamber up and down to your rescue!
Assuming that the normalization factor of the
state is
chosen in terms of the one of the
state consistent with the
ladder relations (12.9) and (12.10), you have:
Next, assume that you have some spin state that is an arbitrary
combination of spin-up and spin-down:
If you put the coefficients in the formula above, except for the common
factor
, in little
tables, you get
the so-called “Pauli spin matrices”:
You can now go further and find the eigenstates of the
and
-operators in terms of the
eigenstates
and
of the
operator. You
can use the techniques of linear algebra, or you can guess. For
example, if you guess
,
Note that the square magnitudes of the coefficients of the states are
all one half, giving a 50/50 chance of finding the
-momentum up or
down. Since the choice of the axis system is arbitrary, this can be
generalized to mean that if the spin in a given direction has an
definite value, then there will be a 50/50 chance of the spin in any
orthogonal direction turning out to be
or
.
You might wonder about the choice of normalization factors in the spin
states (12.16). For example, why not leave out the common
factor
in the
, (negative
-spin, or spin-left),
state? The reason is to ensure that the
-direction ladder operator
and the
-direction one
, as
obtained by cyclic permutation of the ones for
, produce real,
positive multiplication factors. This allows relations valid in the
-direction (like the expressions for triplet and singlet states) to
also apply in the
and
-directions. In addition, with this
choice, if you do a simple change in the labeling of the axes, from
to
or
, the form of the Pauli spin matrices remains
unchanged. The
and
states of positive
-,
respectively
-momentum were chosen a different way: if you rotate
the axis system ![]()
or
axis, these are the
spin-up states along the new
-axes, the
or
axis in the
system you are looking at now, {D.70}.